Ventura County Real Estate Journal

News and Views on Real Estate Issues in Ventura County

Ventura County Real Estate Journal header image 1

Be Prepared to Stop! The Oxnard Traffic Initiative Unmasked.

April 19th, 2008 · Local News, Politics

Danger Ahead for OxnardI hate traffic!  Actually, everyone does.  That’s what is so appealing about the title of a new initiative circulating in Oxnard named “The Oxnard Traffic Initiative.”  Unfortunately, this initiative is really a no growth measure and offers nothing to improve traffic.  Last Thursday, Penny Boehm and Nancy Lindholm, both representing “Citizens for a Safe and Prosperous Oxnard”, shared with the Local Government Relations Committee of the Ventura County Coastal Association of REALTORS (VCCAR) why they oppose this measure and feel it would create more harm than good.

Before, I go on, let me disclose that this article is not intended to be an impartial analysis.  I’m biased and no admirer of Tim Flynn, the Oxnard City Councilman who is a major proponent of this measure.  In my opinion, though well-intentioned, Tim’s combative style of leadership is divisive and he is quick to resort to bullying and displays of temper to get his way.  I have seen him in action more than once.  Of course, none of that has any bearing on whether this initiative is good thing for the City of Oxnard. (It’s not.)

Here’s a video of Tim Flynn talking about the Oxnard Traffic Initiative.

Penny shared with us that the current initiative is the second attempt to get this measure on the ballot.  The first time backers were unable to get enough signatures to qualify.  The new petition circulating is nearly the same but has some minor changes. 

The object of this initiative is to require that no residential project of 5 (or more) homes, or a commercial project of 10,000 feet (or more) could be built if any intersection within 5 miles of the project was or would drop below the letter grade C* even if for only one hour during peak traffic in the preceding year.  According to the out-of-date traffic study the supporters are using, nearly the entire city is subject to these restrictions.  Any project over these limits would have to be approved by the voters of the city.  It would require developers to upgrade those intersections to build even a modest project.  The Catch-22 is that if any of the intersections involved a State Highway such as Oxnard Boulevard (State Route 1), Vineyard Avenue (State Route 232), Fifth Street (State Route 34), only the state can upgrade it. 

Here are some of the key points “Citizens for a Safe and Prosperous Oxnard” would like us to consider.

The new Oxnard Traffic Initiative is flawed and misleading.  It’s not the solution to the issues facing Oxnard. Residents put concerns about public safety, access to health-care, educating our youth, open space, quality housing and jobs before traffic. When you consider traffic issues, they are not limited to just intersections.  They include competing priorities like quality roadways and they include regional issues such as freeway delays; areas over which the City of Oxnard has limited control.

This initiative does not provide one cent towards making traffic improvements. It is full of double talk designed to hide it real purpose.  (No growth.)

The flaws and negative side-effects of the proposed initiative are many. 

  • By requiring a citywide vote on almost every private project over five units or 10,000 square feet it will make it unfeasible for small contractors to build in our city and that will hurt our economy and cost jobs.
  • It will make it more difficult to address blighted areas and the need for affordable housing in our community.
  • It will be more difficult to fund important services in our community or even have the resources to address traffic needs due to a potential loss of City revenue of over $129 million in one time traffic improvement funds and over $11 million per year in on-going funds.

There is more information at their website: www.StopTheOTI.com

To hear what the supporters have to say, visit: www.oxnardtrafficinitiative.org/.  Just don’t read the copy of the initiative they have posted on their website.  It varies in some significant ways from the actual text submitted to the Oxnard City Clerk.  You can see the correct document here.

I do hate traffic and am in complete sympathy with the effort to do something meaningful to help eliminate or lessen it.  The Oxnard Traffic Initiative is not the answer.  It is just too broad and Draconian in it’s scope and will hamstring the City of Oxnard for years to come.

*Level C is defined in initiative as “Stable and acceptable flow but speed and maneuverability somewhat restricted due to higher volumes.  Motorists intermittently wait through more than one signal.  Occasional backups behind left turning vehicles.

→ No CommentsTags:··

Ventura County Fights Back…Stopping Real Estate Scammers-Part II

April 13th, 2008 · Events, Real Estate

Homeowners in default receive so many phone calls, people knocking on their doors and letters that it can reach the point of harassment.  Some of these offers for help are legitimate but many (most) are not.  For the average homeowner it is next to impossible to tell who is on the level and who is not.  In Part I of Ventura County Fights Back…Stopping the Real Estate Scammers I told you that scammers do not look or act dastardly.  This was a theme repeated over and over by all three panelists.  Scammers are charming.  They are mothers, fathers, church goers—often people you know and trust.  More appalling to the audience was they could be a real estate agent—even the agent you used to purchase your home.

If you understand the real estate laws that apply to homeowners in default it becomes a lot easier to sort out the genuine offers of help from those who seek to take advantage of you.  Stella Ling, with the California Association of REALTORS, (C.A.R.) went over the Foreclosure Consultant Law.  This law is designed to offer protection to owners of properties (1 to 4 units) that are in default from people or companies providing foreclosure related services for compensation.  Licensed real estate agents are generally exempt from this law but there are there are some guidelines.  If a real estate agents is doing something outside of what they usually do in the course of a real estate transaction the law may apply.

  • A real estate agent cannot acquire an interest in the property.
  • If the agent makes a direct loan to stop the foreclosure, the law applies.
  • If an agent charges an in advance for services, they must get the contract preapproved by the California Department of Real Estate.  (Stella says noone, to her knowledge, has this type contract approved, so if an agent asks you for an advance fee, chances are almost 100% that they are breaking the law.)

For foreclosure consultants that are not real estate licensees, some of the requirements are:

  • Written contract with a 3 day right to rescind.
  • Consultant cannot acquire interest in property.
  • No money can be paid until services are fully performed.

To be safe, don’t sign anything without getting a second opinion from an appropriate and qualified professional.  Ask for proof of results and references.  And most importantly, always remember that if it sounds too good to be true it probably is.

We were told about an excellent video on Real Estate Scams published by FreddieMac on YouTube to help educate the public.  You can view it here.

Miles Weiss, Senior Deputy District Attorney in charge of the Real Estate Fraud Unit here in Ventura County told the audience about some of the scams that are happening in the county.  Scammers are promising loan modifications and charging upfront fees without any results.  Miles says there is about 0% change of them being able to deliver results.  Another scam involves deeding a 1/8 interest to a shell company that will file for bankruptcy to forestall the foreclosure.  The county recorder is sending his unit any such suspicious documents for investigation.  He encouraged the audience to report any suspicious activity to his office by visiting the Ventura County District Attorney website and filling out a real estate fraud complaint form. 

Miles acknowledged that the problem is huge and he and his staff have limited resources.  As such, they go after the most serious cases first.  It is still important to report all suspected real estate fraud even if the DA is aware of it since you may be the one to supply the missing piece of information that solidifies the case.

To wrap things up, Miles talked about another class of victims; renters.  Real estate scammers often rent out homes that are in the tail end of foreclosure.  They collect deposits and rent without disclosing that information.  Then the bank forecloses and the renters are out on the street having lost all the money they paid to the scammers.  These types of scams are proliferating on sites like Craigslist, so be careful and do your home homework.  

This article is intended to give you a general overview of the problem but cannot address everything that might apply to an individual situation.  Always consult an appropriate professional.  If you have any specific questions, call or email me.

→ No CommentsTags:·····

Ventura County Fights Back…Stopping Real Estate Scammers-Part I

April 11th, 2008 · Events, Real Estate

REFAT logoScam artists do not look or act dastardly.  They are nice friendly people who seem trustworthy.  They look nice, are well dressed and are genuinely likable.  This was the message that Stella Ling, senior council with the California Association of Realtors (C.A.R.) had for the audience of the REFAT Industry Outreach Foreclosure Scams Forum hosted by the Ventura County Real Estate Advisory Team (REFAT) at the River Ridge Marriott Residence Inn in Oxnard.  Panelists included Anne Lanphar, Vice President and Associate Senior Underwriter for First American Title Company, and Miles Weiss, Ventura County Deputy District Attorney. 

I attended along with many other concerned Ventura County real estate professionals who are worried about real estate fraud that seems to be epidemic.  Everyone was hoping to learn more on how to identify and combat the problem.  Ling went on to tell us that any homeowner in foreclosure is under tremendous stress. The weak, elderly, and people with language barriers make prime targets for scammers.  People in default usually have fewer resources to fight back.  The first step in the foreclosure process is the Notice of Default (NOD) and in her opinion, this is like a big billboard saying, “Come and get me scammers.”  Actually, that was in the old days.  Now it’s an instant email blast to the defrauders.  To illustrate the point she told us the story of Martha Rodriguez who located victim homeowners through computerized databases that list homes going into foreclosure.  She would promise homeowners to refinance their homes with a co-signer who had good credit to stop foreclosure and save the home.  Instead of refinancing, Rodriguez and the others submitted loan applications in the names of straw buyers.  These loan applications (which contained false information) let them get loans from lenders that otherwise would never have been obtainable.  The loan proceeds were used to pay off the loan in default and the remaining proceeds were skimmed off by Rodriguez and her cohorts.  Even though the homeowners were promised that they would keep their homes, they lost title.  The straw buyers didn’t make payments on the new loans and they went into default.

Other common scams Ling shared with us were offers to stop foreclosure for an upfront fee of $1,000 (or much more).  These schemes often included placing a lien on property or transferring title to facilitate a refinance from a borrower with a better credit score and a promise to sell the house back to them.  Anne Lanphar, with First American Title, shared what title companies look for in trying to combat fraud.  She identified the following red flags that are common elements of problem transactions:

  • Escrow has no contact with seller.
  • Someone signing for the seller using a Power or Attorney.
  • Buyer is buying home subject to existing loan.
  • Seller to remain in property.
  • Repurchase options for seller.
  • Usually high level of fees.
  • Someone assisting borrower.
  • Large payments to 3rd parties.
  • Same notary on buyers loan documents and seller’s grant deed.
  • Seller transferring property into a trust (other than a family trust.)
  • Purchase price way below market value. 

It is in the best interest of Title and Escrow companies to be vigilant. Anne gave us an example of a person who recently tried to open an escrow with First America Title where the seller didn’t speak English and was selling his home for the $200,000 loan amount (it was in default.) The property was worth $450,000.  They refused the escrow and turned in a complaint the Ventura County District Attorney.  The goal is to stop these kinds of scams before they get started. 

 (To be continued in Part II)

→ 2 CommentsTags:·····

CalHFA-Great Financing for First Time Homebuyers

April 10th, 2008 · Real Estate

CalFHA FinancingRight now we’re in the middle of a real estate market where buyers are getting great deals not only on homes, but on the financing as well.  Never in recent years have there been as many great choices of homes for sale as there are today.  Gone for now are the days when you had just a handful of homes to chose from and just two choices:  take it or leave it.  Then you had to battle it out with other buyers and ended up settling for a home you weren’t crazy about.  There is a terrific selection and you can find a home you’ll be in love with for years to come.  For first—time home buyers the news is even better.  There are below market loans from the California Housing Finance Agency (CalHFA) that are available for first time buyers (which includes anyone who hasn’t owned a home for at least 3 years.)  In Ventura County, CalHFA will loan on brand new and resale homes priced up to $729,750 and new homes in targeted census tracts can be as high as $784,282.  This is a huge deal because just a few years ago the maximum purchase prices allowed could barely get you a starter condo.

CalHFA offers the kind of loans that won’t get you in trouble like the subprime loans you’ve read about.  These are 30, 35, or 40 year low-interest, fixed rate loans.  No variable rates and no surprise increases in your payment to worry about.  There are even programs to help with closing costs and down payment assistance.  If you work for the public school system there are even more advantages.

So what’s the catch?  Well, there are limitations on how much income you can make and just like the old days, there is a bit more paperwork (and time) involved so you’ll need at least a 45 day escrow period,  but that’s pretty much it. 

Visit www.calhfa.com on the web to learn more and find a list of approved local lenders.  Or better yet, sent me an email and I can refer you to a lender who specializes in first-time buyers.

→ No CommentsTags:··

What the PTF***?

April 8th, 2008 · Real Estate, Real Estate Taxes

(This article was written by my fellow agent and collegue at RE/MAX Gold Coast REALTORS , Janet Dorsey.)

Janet DorseyIn a previous post titled “Private Transfer Fees—A Hidden Tax”, I described Private Transfer Taxes or Private Transfer Fees, as they are now called. The California Association of REALTORS (C.A.R.) coined these terms, but don’t expect that wording when looking to see if you have it. Developers are very creative in disguising the name with terms like Endowment Fee, Trust Fee, Open Space Conservatory Fee, etc. The key is that it’s going to be a fee that shows up in the title search and not on your property tax bill. The following is an update to that post:

I have found 2 developments in Ventura County that have imposed this Private Transfer Fee. One in Camarillo at Addison Lane in Village at the Park. The other in Ventura at the Melody Condominiums—where Telephone Road and Saratoga Avenue intersect. Both developments were built by Lennar.

If you are a homeowner in either of these developments, you have an added, legally-required disclosure to make to any interested buyer regarding the existence of a Private Transfer Fee. You may not recall or even know that you have this fee attached to your property, but I assure you, a simple title search on your property will reveal not only the existence of the fee, but the method for calculating the fee which must be paid prior to transfering your property.

In the case of these Lennar built homes, the Private Transfer Fee is specifically named an “Endowment Fee” in the title record with the profits from such fees going to the Lennar Charitable Housing Foundation. And the kicker…This fee will be applied to all transfers of these properties—in perpetuity!

If you are a propective buyer for one of these homes, you’d better beware. You will inherit the obligation to pay the “Endowment Fee” should you decide to move forward and make the purchase. I hope you really love that home ‘cause you may have a harder time selling it in today’s market!

Lennar’s website describes the Lennar Charitable Housing Foundation and specifically states, “Lennar is pleased to have been a founder in this unique program of giving back to our Community, and looks forward to its expansion in other areas of Lennar Community development.” No kidding—their seed has definitely been spread around. Lennar has developments throughout Southern California—some as close to Ventura County as Valencia and Santa Clarita. And, its a safe bet that Lennar has at least some of these developments contributing to their foundation.

→ No CommentsTags: